sites I found,
notes I made,
excerpts I copied,
abbreviations I made,
key text I highlighted,
acronyms I came up with
... anything to help me remember the sheer volume of (in my view - pointless) variances and nuances of "According To TOGAF " for the multi-choice Part 1 exam.
Part 2 - Scenarios are relatively easy in my view, because you are applying the process and principles but the Part One which has questions which for a couple I cannot find any DIRECT ANSWER (i.e. the answer is an extrapolation of knowledge) either in the TOGAF documentation or from Google searches ... that's an entirely different thing! I got very frustrated trying to learn this stuff!
e.g. How do you arrive at answer D for this question?
Which of the following correctly defines the Organisation category in the Architecture Content Framework?
- a) Organisation, Location and Capabilities
- b) Actor, Location, Role and Capabilities
- c) Requirements, Actor and Function
- d) Location, Actor, Role, and Organisation
- e) Actor, Location and Structure
... eventually ... knowing the answer ... I was able to find it buried in this diagram
... nor can I see anywhere that clearly describes: the reasons for establishing an Architecture Board
i.e.
TOGAF states that establishing and operating an Architecture Board is more than offset by the savings accrued from preventing one off solutions and unconstrained development. Which of the following answers does TOGAF not state as a reason for establishing an Architecture Board?
- a) Higher risk
- b) High cost of operation and support
- c) High costs of development
- d) Lower quality
- e) Better understanding of the business and their requirements
Which of the following is incorrect when describing Architecture Deliverables?
- a) Architecture Deliverables contain Artifacts correct
- b) Artifacts within deliverables may include Catalogs, Matrices and Diagrams correct
- c) An Architecture Definition Document is an architectural deliverable correct
- d) Architecture Deliverables may be composed of more than one artifact correct
- e) Deliverables cannot be used as building blocks ... cannot is incorrect so deliverables CAN be used as building blocks
Then there are subtle questions like:
2 - Which one of the following is not a characteristic of a building block?
Choose one of the following answers
... until you realise B uses the word cannot not can
Anyhow ... on to my scruffy notes ... just in case they help anyone else with their TOGAF study
Sites
An absolutely EXCELLENT collection of many (most) of the likely questions for Part 1 all in the one location.http://wiki.glitchdata.com/index.php?title=TOGAF9:_Part_1_-_Sample_Questions#Under_Preparation
Part 1 & 2 simulation exams
http://theopenarch.com/
Deliverables and their content:
http://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf9-doc/arch/chap36.html#tag_36_02_02
Jottings/Notes
ADM
Revise Prelim phase steps
- 6.4.1 Scope the Enterprise Organizations Impacted
- 6.4.2 Confirm Governance and Support Frameworks
- 6.4.3 Define and Establish Enterprise Architecture Team and Organization
- 6.4.4 Identify and Establish Architecture Principles
- 6.4.5 Tailor TOGAF and, if any, Other Selected Architecture Framework(s)
- 6.4.6 Implement Architecture Tools
Revise Prelim phase outputs -
- Organizational Model for Enterprise Architecture (see Part IV, 36.2.16 Organizational Model for Enterprise Architecture), including:
- Scope of organizations impacted
- Maturity assessment, gaps, and resolution approach
- Roles and responsibilities for architecture team(s)
- Constraints on architecture work
- Budget requirements
- Governance and support strategy
- Tailored Architecture Framework (see Part IV, 36.2.21 Tailored Architecture Framework), including:
- Tailored architecture method
- Tailored architecture content (deliverables and artifacts)
- Architecture Principles (see Part IV, 36.2.4 Architecture Principles)
- Configured and deployed tools
- Initial Architecture Repository (see Part IV, 36.2.5 Architecture Repository), populated with framework content
- Restatement of, or reference to, business principles, business goals, and business drivers (see Part IV, 36.2.9 Business Principles, Business Goals, and Business Drivers)
- Request for Architecture Work (optional) (see Part IV, 36.2.17 Request for Architecture Work)
- Architecture Governance Framework (see (Part VII, 50.2 Architecture Governance Framework)
Revise phase A steps
- 7.4.1 Establish the Architecture Project
- 7.4.2 Identify Stakeholders, Concerns, and Business Requirements
- 7.4.3 Confirm and Elaborate Business Goals, Business Drivers, and Constraints
- 7.4.4 Evaluate Business Capabilities
- 7.4.5 Assess Readiness for Business Transformation
- 7.4.6 Define Scope
- 7.4.7 Confirm and Elaborate Architecture Principles, including Business Principles
- 7.4.8 Develop Architecture Vision
- 7.4.9 Define the Target Architecture Value Propositions and KPIs
- 7.4.10 Identify the Business Transformation Risks and Mitigation Activities
- 7.4.11 Develop Statement of Architecture Work; Secure Approval
Revise phase A outputs
- Approved Statement of Architecture Work (see Part IV, 36.2.20 Statement of Architecture Work), including in particular:
- Architecture project description and scope
- Overview of Architecture Vision
- Architecture project plan and schedule
- Refined statements of business principles, business goals, and business drivers (see Part IV, 36.2.9 Business Principles, Business Goals, and Business Drivers)
- Architecture principles (see Part IV, 23. Architecture Principles)
- Capability Assessment (see Part IV, 36.2.10 Capability Assessment)
- Tailored Architecture Framework (see Part IV, 36.2.21 Tailored Architecture Framework) (for the engagement), including:
- Tailored architecture method
- Tailored architecture content (deliverables and artifacts)
- Configured and deployed tools
- Architecture Vision (see Part IV, 36.2.8 Architecture Vision), including:
- Problem description
- Objective of the Statement of Architecture Work
- Summary views
- Business Scenario (optional)
- Refined key high-level stakeholder requirements
- Draft Architecture Definition Document, including (when in scope):
- Baseline Business Architecture, Version 0.1
- Baseline Data Architecture, Version 0.1
- Baseline Application Architecture, Version 0.1
- Baseline Technology Architecture, Version 0.1
- Target Business Architecture, Version 0.1
- Target Data Architecture, Version 0.1
- Target Application Architecture, Version 0.1
- Target Technology Architecture, Version 0.1
- Communications Plan (see Part IV, 36.2.12 Communications Plan)
- Additional Architecture Repository content (see Part IV, 36.2.5 Architecture Repository)
Revise phase B steps B=Business of BDAT
- 8.4.1 Select Reference Models, Viewpoints, and Tools
- 8.4.2 Develop Baseline Business Architecture Description
- 8.4.3 Develop Target Business Architecture Description
- 8.4.4 Perform Gap Analysis
- 8.4.5 Define Candidate Roadmap Components
- 8.4.6 Resolve Impacts Across the Architecture Landscape
- 8.4.7 Conduct Formal Stakeholder Review
- 8.4.8 Finalize the Business Architecture
- 8.4.9 Create Architecture Definition Document
- Refined and updated versions of the Architecture Vision phase deliverables, where applicable, including:
- Statement of Architecture Work (see Part IV, 36.2.20 Statement of Architecture Work), updated if necessary
- Validated business principles, business goals, and business drivers (see Part IV, 36.2.9 Business Principles, Business Goals, and Business Drivers), updated if necessary
- Architecture principles (see Part IV, 36.2.4 Architecture Principles)
- Draft Architecture Definition Document (see Part IV, 36.2.3 Architecture Definition Document), including:
- Baseline Business Architecture, Version 1.0 (detailed), if appropriate
- Target Business Architecture, Version 1.0 (detailed), including:
- Organization structure - identifying business locations and relating them to organizational units
- Business goals and objectives - for the enterprise and each organizational unit
- Business functions - a detailed, recursive step involving successive decomposition of major functional areas into sub-functions
- Business services - the services that the enterprise and each enterprise unit provides to its customers, both internally and externally
- Business processes, including measures and deliverables
- Business roles, including development and modification of skills requirements
- Business data model
- Correlation of organization and functions - relate business functions to organizational units in the form of a matrix report
- Views corresponding to the selected viewpoints addressing key stakeholder concerns
- Draft Architecture Requirements Specification (see Part IV, 36.2.6 Architecture Requirements Specification), including such Business Architecture requirements as:
- Gap analysis results
- Technical requirements - identifying, categorizing, and prioritizing the implications for work in the remaining architecture domains; for example, by a dependency/priority matrix (for example, guiding trade-off between speed of transaction processing and security); list the specific models that are expected to be produced (for example, expressed as primitives of the Zachman Framework)
- Updated business requirements
- Business Architecture components of an Architecture Roadmap (see Part IV, 36.2.7 Architecture Roadmap)
- 10.4.1 Select Reference Models, Viewpoints, and Tools
- 10.4.2 Develop Baseline Data Architecture Description
- 10.4.3 Develop Target Data Architecture Description
- 10.4.4 Perform Gap Analysis
- 10.4.5 Define Candidate Roadmap Components
- 10.4.6 Resolve Impacts Across the Architecture Landscape
- 10.4.7 Conduct Formal Stakeholder Review
- 10.4.8 Finalize the Data Architecture
- 10.4.9 Create Architecture Definition Document
Revise phase C - Data outputs
- Refined and updated versions of the Architecture Vision phase deliverables, where applicable:
- Statement of Architecture Work (see Part IV, 36.2.20 Statement of Architecture Work), updated if necessary
- Validated data principles (see Part III, 23.6.2 Data Principles), or new data principles (if generated here)
- Draft Architecture Definition Document (see Part IV, 36.2.3 Architecture Definition Document), including:
- Baseline Data Architecture, Version 1.0, if appropriate
- Target Data Architecture, Version 1.0
- Business data model
- Logical data model
- Data management process models
- Data Entity/Business Function matrix
- Views corresponding to the selected viewpoints addressing key stakeholder concerns
- Draft Architecture Requirements Specification (see Part IV, 36.2.6 Architecture Requirements Specification), including such Data Architecture requirements as:
- Gap analysis results
- Data interoperability requirements
- Relevant technical requirements that will apply to this evolution of the architecture development cycle
- Constraints on the Technology Architecture about to be designed
- Updated business requirements, if appropriate
- Updated application requirements, if appropriate
- Data Architecture components of an Architecture Roadmap (see Part IV, 36.2.7 Architecture Roadmap)
Revise phase C - Application steps - C=CAta a.k.a. Application of BDAT
Revise phase C - Application outputs
Revise phase D steps - D=Digital Technology of BDAT
- 11.4.1 Select Reference Models, Viewpoints, and Tools
- 11.4.2 Develop Baseline Application Architecture Description
- 11.4.3 Develop Target Application Architecture Description
- 11.4.4 Perform Gap Analysis
- 11.4.5 Define Candidate Roadmap Components
- 11.4.6 Resolve Impacts Across the Architecture Landscape
- 11.4.7 Conduct Formal Stakeholder Review
- 11.4.8 Finalize the Application Architecture
- 11.4.9 Create Architecture Definition Document
- Refined and updated versions of the Architecture Vision phase deliverables, where applicable:
- Statement of Architecture Work (see Part IV, 36.2.20 Statement of Architecture Work), updated if necessary
- Validated application principles, or new application principles (if generated here)
- Draft Architecture Definition Document (see Part IV, 36.2.3 Architecture Definition Document), including:
- Baseline Application Architecture, Version 1.0, if appropriate
- Target Application Architecture, Version 1.0
- Process systems model
- Place systems model
- Time systems model
- People systems model
- Views corresponding to the selected viewpoints, addressing key stakeholder concerns
- Draft Architecture Requirements Specification (see Part IV, 36.2.6 Architecture Requirements Specification), including such Application Architecture requirements as:
- Gap analysis results
- Applications interoperability requirements
- Relevant technical requirements that will apply to this evolution of the architecture development cycle
- Constraints on the Technology Architecture about to be designed
- Updated business requirements, if appropriate
- Updated data requirements, if appropriate
- Application Architecture components of an Architecture Roadmap (see Part IV, 36.2.7 Architecture Roadmap)
- 12.4.1 Select Reference Models, Viewpoints, and Tools
- 12.4.2 Develop Baseline Technology Architecture Description
- 12.4.3 Develop Target Technology Architecture Description
- 12.4.4 Perform Gap Analysis
- 12.4.5 Define Candidate Roadmap Components
- 12.4.6 Resolve Impacts Across the Architecture Landscape
- 12.4.7 Conduct Formal Stakeholder Review
- 12.4.8 Finalize the Technology Architecture
- 12.4.9 Create Architecture Definition Document
Revise phase D outputs
- Refined and updated versions of the Architecture Vision phase deliverables, where applicable:
- Statement of Architecture Work (see Part IV, 36.2.20 Statement of Architecture Work), updated if necessary
- Validated technology principles, or new technology principles (if generated here)
- Draft Architecture Definition Document (see Part IV, 36.2.3 Architecture Definition Document), including:
- Target Technology Architecture, Version 1.0 (detailed), including:
- Technology Components and their relationships to information systems
- Technology platforms and their decomposition, showing the combinations of technology required to realize a particular technology "stack"
- Environments and locations - a grouping of the required technology into computing environments (e.g., development, production)
- Expected processing load and distribution of load across technology components
- Physical (network) communications
- Hardware and network specifications
- Baseline Technology Architecture, Version 1.0 (detailed), if appropriate
- Views corresponding to the selected viewpoints addressing key stakeholder concerns
- Target Technology Architecture, Version 1.0 (detailed), including:
- Draft Architecture Requirements Specification (see Part IV, 36.2.6 Architecture Requirements Specification), including such Technology Architecture requirements as:
- Gap analysis results
- Requirements output from Phases B and C
- Updated technology requirements
- Technology Architecture components of an Architecture Roadmap (see Part IV, 36.2.7 Architecture Roadmap)
Revise phase E steps E=Establish (Opportuniteee to Creeeate/Deeetermine/Identeeefy/Reeeview/Reeefine/Readieeeness)
- 13.4.1 Determine/Confirm Key Corporate Change Attributes
- 13.4.2 Determine Business Constraints for Implementation
- 13.4.3 Review and Consolidate Gap Analysis Results from Phases B to D
- 13.4.4 Review Consolidated Requirements Across Related Business Functions
- 13.4.5 Consolidate and Reconcile Interoperability Requirements
- 13.4.6 Refine and Validate Dependencies
- 13.4.7 Confirm Readiness and Risk for Business Transformation
- 13.4.8 Formulate Implementation and Migration Strategy
- 13.4.9 Identify and Group Major Work Packages
- 13.4.10 Identify Transition Architectures
- 13.4.11 Create the Architecture Roadmap & Implementation and Migration Plan
Revise phase E outputs
- Refined and updated version of the Architecture Vision phase deliverables, where applicable, including:
- Architecture Vision, including definition of types and degrees of interoperability
- Statement of Architecture Work (see Part IV, 36.2.20 Statement of Architecture Work), updated if necessary
- Draft Architecture Definition Document (see Part IV, 36.2.3 Architecture Definition Document), including:
- Baseline Business Architecture, Version 1.0 updated if necessary
- Target Business Architecture, Version 1.0 updated if necessary
- Baseline Data Architecture, Version 1.0 updated if necessary
- Target Data Architecture, Version 1.0 updated if necessary
- Baseline Application Architecture, Version 1.0 updated if necessary
- Target Application Architecture, Version 1.0 updated if necessary
- Baseline Technology Architecture, Version 1.0 updated if necessary
- Target Technology Architecture, Version 1.0 updated if necessary
- Transition Architecture, number and scope as necessary
- Views corresponding to the selected viewpoints addressing key stakeholder concerns
- Draft Architecture Requirements Specification (see Part IV, 36.2.6 Architecture Requirements Specification), including:
- Consolidated Gaps, Solutions, and Dependencies Assessment
- Capability Assessments, including:
- Business Capability Assessment
- IT Capability Assessment
- Architecture Roadmap (see Part IV, 36.2.7 Architecture Roadmap), including:
- Work package portfolio:
- Work package description (name, description, objectives)
- Functional requirements
- Dependencies
- Relationship to opportunity
- Relationship to Architecture Definition Document and Architecture Requirements Specification
- Relationship to any capability increments
- Business value
- Implementation Factor Assessment and Deduction Matrix
- Impact
- Identification of Transition Architectures, if any, including:
- Relationship to Architecture Definition Document
- Implementation recommendations:
- Criteria measures of effectiveness
- Risks and issues
- Solution Building Blocks (SBBs)
- Work package portfolio:
- Implementation and Migration Plan, Version 0.1, including:
- Implementation and Migration Strategy
Revise phase F steps F=Finalise (a.k.a. Assign/Complete/Confirm/Generate/Prioritise/Transition)
- 14.4.1 Confirm Management Framework Interactions for the Implementation and Migration Plan
- 14.4.2 Assign a Business Value to Each Work Package
- 14.4.3 Estimate Resource Requirements, Project Timings, and Availability/Delivery Vehicle
- 14.4.4 Prioritize the Migration Projects through the Conduct of a Cost/Benefit Assessment and Risk Validation
- 14.4.5 Confirm Architecture Roadmap and Update Architecture Definition Document
- 14.4.6 Generate the Implementation and Migration Plan
- 14.4.7 Complete the Architecture Development Cycle and Document Lessons Learned
Revise phase F outputs
- Implementation and Migration Plan, Version 1.0 (see Part IV, 36.2.14 Implementation and Migration Plan), including:
- Implementation and Migration Strategy
- Project and portfolio breakdown of the implementation:
- Allocation of work packages to project and portfolio
- Capabilities delivered by projects
- Relationship to Target Architecture and any Transition Architectures
- Milestones and timing
- Work breakdown structure
- Project charters (optional):
- Related work packages
- Business value
- Risk, issues, assumptions, dependencies
- Resource requirements and costs
- Benefits of migration
- Estimated costs of migration options
- Finalized Architecture Definition Document (see Part IV, 36.2.3 Architecture Definition Document), including:
- Finalized Transition Architectures, if any
- Finalized Architecture Requirements Specification (see Part IV, 36.2.6 Architecture Requirements Specification)
- Finalized Architecture Roadmap (see Part IV, 36.2.7 Architecture Roadmap)
- Re-Usable Architecture Building Blocks (see Part IV, 36.2.1 Architecture Building Blocks)
- Requests for Architecture Work (see Part IV, 36.2.17 Request for Architecture Work) for a new iteration of the ADM cycle (if any)
- Implementation Governance Model (see Part IV, 36.2.15 Implementation Governance Model)
(if any) - Change Requests for the Architecture Capability arising from lessons learned
Revise phase G steps G=Govern
- 15.4.1 Confirm Scope and Priorities for Deployment with Development Management
- 15.4.2 Identify Deployment Resources and Skills
- 15.4.3 Guide Development of Solutions Deployment
- 15.4.4 Perform Enterprise Architecture Compliance Reviews
- 15.4.5 Implement Business and IT Operations
- 15.4.6 Perform PIR and Close the Implementation
Revise phase G outputs
- Architecture Contract (signed) (see Part VII, 49. Architecture Contracts)
- Compliance Assessments (see Part IV, 36.2.13 Compliance Assessment)
- Change Requests (see Part IV, 36.2.11 Change Request)
- Architecture-compliant solutions deployed including:
- The architecture-compliant implemented system
- Note:
- The implemented system is actually an output of the development process. However, given the importance of this output, it is stated here as an output of the ADM. The direct involvement of architecture staff in implementation will vary according to organizational policy, as described in Part VII, 50. Architecture Governance.
- Populated Architecture Repository
- Architecture compliance recommendations and dispensations
- Recommendations on service delivery requirements
- Recommendations on performance metrics
- Service Level Agreements (SLAs)
- Architecture Vision, updated post-implementation
- Architecture Definition Document, updated post-implementation
- Business and IT operating models for the implemented solution
- The architecture-compliant implemented system
Revise phase H steps
Revise phase H outputs
Various parts of TOGAF
Implementation Governance Model - how
the Transition Architecture that implements the architecture will be
governed through implementation. Typical contents of an Implementation
Governance Model are:
- Governance processes
- Governance organization structure
- Governance roles and responsibilities
- Governance checkpoints and success/failure criteria
Architecture Repository - made up of:
- Metamodel, Capability, Landscape, (Ref)Library, (Gov)Log, SIB
MetaCap (pause) Lanscape,Library,Log n' SIB
Technology Architecture - scope
Parts/Structure of Architecture Governance - established in Prelim, fulfilled in G & H https://prezi.com/c_q8ow3nfuwo/togaf-architecture-governance/
PCRF or ProcConRepoFlow - Process, Content, Repository, process Flow control
Concern vs Requirement - concern=key interests crucially important to stakeholders, determine acceptability of the system. requirement=statement of need that must be met by a particular architecture
What to ABB's "do" -
- describe required capability of a single aspect of the overall model
- capture architecture requirements
Capability Assessment
TRM - what is it - provides a model and taxonomy of generic platform services
has two main components:
- A taxonomy, which defines terminology, and provides a coherent description of the components and conceptual structure of an information system
- A TRM graphic, providing a visual representation of the taxonomy, to aid understanding
- Data Interchange
- Data Management
- Graphics and Imaging
- International Operation
- Location and Directory
- Network
- Operating System
- Software Engineering
- Transaction Processing
- User Interface
- Security
- System and Network Management
The core components of the III-RM are:
- Business Applications
- Brokering
- Information Provider
- Information Consumer
- Infrastructure Applications
- Development Tools
- Management Utilities
- Application Platform
- Interfaces used between the components
- Qualities the Application Software and Application Platform must adhere to
Value Chain - phase A - high-level view
of an enterprise and how it interacts with the outside world, focuses
on presentational impact so all participants understand the high-level
functional and organizational context of the architecture engagement
Transition states
Architecture
Contracts - Joint agreements between development partners and sponsors
on the deliverables, quality, and fitness-for-purpose of an
architecture.
Architecture Contracts may occur at various stages of the Architecture Development Method:
- Statement of Architecture Work created in Phase A
- The development of one or more architecture domains (BDAT) will normally be governed by an Architecture Contract
- At the beginning of Phase G between the architecture function and the function responsible for implementing the enterprise architecture (In larger-scale implementations, there may well be one Architecture Contract per implementation team)
- At the end of Phase G between the architecting function and the business users who will be building and deploying application systems
They provide:
- continuous monitoring to check integrity, changes, decision-making, and audit of all architecture-related activities
- Adherence to principles, standards, and requirements of the existing or developing architectures
- Identification of risks in all aspects of the development and implementation of the architecture(s)
- accountability, responsibility, and discipline with regard to the development and usage of all architectural artifacts
- formal understanding of the governance organization responsible for the contract, their level of authority, and scope of the architecture under the governance of this body
The 7 parts of TOGAF - I, A, GT, Cont - EC n' T, RM n' Cap - 1.Intro, 2.ADM, 3.AG&T, ACF(content), Ent Contin, RefMod, ACF(capability)
(learn as a rhythm: IA (pause) GTcont (pause) EC'n'T (pause) RM'n'Cap)
ADM Guidelines and Techniques - Part III
- Iteration - has 4 common sub-iterations CDTG
- Prelim~A & Prelim~H (Context/Capability)
- B~F and intra_B~D (Development)
- E~F (Transition)
- G~H (Governance)
- Prelim~A & Prelim~H (Context/Capability)
- Application - will occur
- at Strategic, Segment & Capability levels SSC/BDTR
- across Subject areas (Breadth), to varying Detail (Depth), for duration's (Time) dependent on Breadth & Depth of the described architecture. Accuracy has a bell-curve depending on Recency, where an architecture decreases in accuracy if not actively maintained.
- Security
- Often treated as a separate architecture domain within the EA while needing to be fully integrated in it.
- has its own discrete methodology, views and viewpoints.
- Security considerations have an impact on Phases A to H
- Governing SOA's - Enterprise architecture provides frameworks, tools, and techniques to assist organizations with the development and maintenance of their SOAs
- Principles are general rules and guidelines, intended to be enduring and seldom amended, that inform and support.
- Enterprise principles provide a basis for decision-making throughout an enterprise, and inform how the organization sets about fulfilling its mission.
- Architecture principles govern the architecture process
- Structure
- Name - represent the essence of the rule and be easy to remember
- Statement - succinctly and unambiguously communicate the fundamental rule.
- Rationale - highlight the business benefits of adhering to the principle
- Implications - Should highlight both business and IT requirements for carrying out the principle - in terms of resources, costs, and activities/tasks
- Stakeholder Management - Support from the more powerful stakeholders will help the engagement win more resource, thus making the architecture engagement more likely to succeed.
- Patterns - Building blocks are what you use: patterns can tell you how you use them, when, why, and what trade-offs you have to make in doing so.
- Business Scenarios -
- Gap Analysis
- Migration Planning Techniques
- Interoperability Requirements
- Business Transformation Readiness Assessment
- Risk Management
- Capability-Based Planning
Content vs Capability frameworks -
Techniques for Architecture Development
- Architecture Principles
- Stakeholder Management
- Architecture Patterns
- Business Scenarios
- Gap Analysis
- Migration Planning Techniques
- Interoperability Requirements
- Business Transformation Readiness Assessment
- Risk Management
- Capability-Based Planning
- NO CHANGE MANAGEMENT !
The key point of the ADM cycle is to focus on what creates value to the
enterprise, and to select horizontal and vertical scope
enterprise, and to select horizontal and vertical scope
Incorrect reasons for limiting architecture scope
- inflexibility of the baseline IT technical architecture
The relationship between the Architecture Continuum and
the Solutions Continuum is one of Guidance, direction and support GDS
the Solutions Continuum is one of Guidance, direction and support GDS
Definition of the Organisation category in the AContF - LARO
Location Actor Role Organisation
Location Actor Role Organisation
Architecture Continuum consists of architecture types - FICO
Foundation, Industry, Common, Organisation
Foundation, Industry, Common, Organisation
Compliance
- Irrelevant - Implementation has no features in common with specification
- Consistent - implementation has some features in common with the spec and they conform to the spec, BUT,
- some parts of the spec are NOT implemented and
- there are parts of the implementation NOT COVERED by the spec. (not all but also extras)
- Compliant - some features of spec are implemented and conform to the spec BUT,
- some parts of the spec are NOT implemented
- nothing apart from the spec is implemented (Not all and nothing extra)
- Conformant - all features of spec implemented in conformance BUT,
- extra features don't conform
- Fully conformant - everything implemented is in the spec and conforms to it
- Non-conformant - any time a spec is implemented but does not conform to the spec
summarised as: Risk levels and Frequency make up Effect
Architecture Skills Framework categories
- Generic Skills
- Business Skills & Methods
- Enterprise Architecture Skills
- Program or Project Management Skills
- IT General Knowledge Skills
- Technical IT Skills
- Legal Environment
Compliance -
- Irrelevant
- nothing from spec implemented
- nothing implemented is in spec
- Consistent
- some spec'd not implemented
- some impl'd not spec'd
- some spec'd and impl'd
- Compliant
- Not all spec's impl'd
- but nothing outside of spec is impl'd
- Conformant
- All spec'd are impl'd
- even if some impl'd are not spec'd
- Fully conformant
- All spec'd and all impl'd
No comments:
Post a Comment